2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jose Harris v. Thomas A. Coughlin, III Daniel A. Senkowski, Stanley Berg.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Harris v. Thomas A. Coughlin, III Daniel A. Senkowski, Stanley Berg Anchor | green | “reliance on circumstantial evidence of retaliation-namely the proximity of the disciplinary action to his complaint where no misbehavior reports were previously filed against him-does not suffice to defeat summary judgment.” | 3 |
| 2 | Howard Ayers v. Sergeant Paul Stewart and Captain David Stark | green | “reliance on circumstantial evidence of retaliation-namely the proximity of the disciplinary action to his complaint where no misbehavior reports were previously filed against him-does not suffice to defeat summary judgment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.