Topic: whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favor… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #4

26 canonical passages across 24 cases, quoted by 18,174 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jackson v. Virginia.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Jackson v. Virginia Anchor
scotus · 1979
red “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” 12,761
2 State v. Ashby
tenn · 1991
green “conditioned upon the affirmative showing in the record that the trial court considered the sentencing principles and all relevant facts and circumstances.” 1,602
3 State v. Grace
tenn · 1973
yellow “a guilty verdict by the jury, approved by the trial judge, accredits the testimony of the witnesses for the state and resolves all conflicts in favor of the theory of the state.” 1,011
4 State v. Bland
tenn · 1997
green “questions concerning the credibility of witnesses, the weight and value to be given the evidence, as well as all factual issues raised by the evidence are resolved by the trier of fact.” 523
5 State v. Tuggle
tenn · 1982
green “a jury conviction removes the presumption of innocence with which a defendant is initially cloaked and replaces it with one of guilt, so that on appeal a convicted defendant has the burden of demonstrating that the evidence is insufficient.” 469
6 State v. Vasques
tenn · 2007
green “afforded the strongest legitimate view of the evidence and all reasonable inferences” 377
7 State v. Fletcher
tenncrimapp · 1991
green “even if we would have preferred a different result.” 260
8 State v. Hall
tenn · 1998
green “a crime may be established by direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, or a combination of the two.” 181
9 State v. Shelton
tenncrimapp · 1992
green “if the trial court applies inappropriate factors or otherwise fails to follow the 1989 sentencing act, the presumption of correctness falls.” 144
10 State v. Ruiz
tenn · 2006
red “illogical or unreasonable and causes an injustice to the party complaining.” 143
11 State v. Ashby
tenn · 1991
green “the burden of showing that the sentence is improper is upon the appellant.” 113
12 State v. Franklin
tenn · 2010
green “interfere with the exercise of that discretion unless a clear abuse appears on the face of the record.” 107
13 State v. Dowdy
tenncrimapp · 1994
green “the potential or lack of potential for the rehabilitation or treatment of a defendant should be considered in determining the sentence alternative or length of a term to be imposed.” 83
14 State v. Lewis
tenn · 2007
green “an incorrect legal standard or reaches a conclusion that is 'illogical or unreasonable and causes an injustice to the party complaining.” 69
15 State v. Lane
tenn · 1999
green “justly deserved in relation to the seriousness of the offense,” 66
16 State v. Banks
tenn · 1978
green “photographs of the corpse are admissible in murder prosecutions if they are relevant to the issues on trial, notwithstanding their gruesome and horrifying character.” 57
17 State v. Mounger
tenncrimapp · 1999
green “suitability for full probation.” 39
18 State v. Cabbage
tenn · 1978
red “the state is entitled to the strongest legitimate view of the trial evidence and all reasonable or legitimate inferences which may be drawn therefrom.” 38
19 State v. Adkisson
tenncrimapp · 1994
green “fundamental proportions in the indictment process, a right to the proof of every element of the offense and . . . constitutional in nature.” 37
20 State v. Byrd
tenncrimapp · 1993
green “the trial court must presume that a defendant sentenced to eight years or less and not an offender for whom incarceration is a priority is subject to alternative sentencing and that a sentence other than incarceration would result in successful rehabilitation . . . .” 22
21 State v. Keen
tenncrimapp · 1999
green “a transcript of the guilty plea hearing is often (if not always) needed in order to conduct a proper review of the sentence imposed.” 21
22 State v. Davis
tenn · 1997
green “although probation 'must be automatically considered as a sentencing option for eligible defendants, the defendant is not automatically entitled to probation as a matter of law.” 15
23 State v. Mounger
tenncrimapp · 1999
green “suitability for full probation as distinguished from his favorable candidacy for alternative sentencing in general.” 12
24 State v. Gilliland
tenn · 2000
green “use care in identifying the issues to be addressed by the rule 404(b) evidence.” 8
25 State v. West
tenn · 1989
green “that defense counsel was 'trying to throw sand in the eyes of the jury' and 'blowing smoke in the face of the jury” 8
26 State v. McPherson
tenncrimapp · 1994
green “the entry of a mistrial is appropriate when the trial cannot continue for some reason, or if the trial does continue, a miscarriage of justice will occur.” 8

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check