2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amy Roth v. Cha Hollywood Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amy Roth v. Cha Hollywood Medical Center Anchor | green | “defendant remove outside the two thirty-day periods on the basis of its own information.” | 3 |
| 2 | Romo v. FFG Insurance | green | “the court finds that plaintiff could recover significant civil penalties under the magnuson-moss act, and that these sums can be 24 considered in the amount in controversy equation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.