2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loder v. City of Glendale.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loder v. City of Glendale Anchor | green | “elements do not eliminate the necessity for weighing and balancing the justification for the conduct in question against the intrusion on privacy resulting from the conduct in any case that raises a genuine, nontrivial invasion of a protected privacy interest.” | 3 |
| 2 | Lazar v. Hertz Corp. | green | “in effect, the ucl borrows violations of other laws - such as the state's antidiscrimination laws - and makes those unlawful practices actionable under the ucl.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.