2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Armenta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Armenta Anchor | green | “in the absence of a finding on a factual issue we must indulge the presumption that the party with the burden of proof failed to sustain their burden on issue.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Armenta | green | “in the absence of a finding on a factual issue we must indulge the presumption that the party with the burden of proof failed to sustain their burden on issue.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.