2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peters v. Peters.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peters v. Peters Anchor | green | “in iowa separate maintenance has not been a statutory remedy, and authority to grant that relief has been based upon the inherent power of courts of equity.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hardenbergh v. Both | green | “enforcement was an original and inherent power of a court of equity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.