2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Saleem v. Keisler.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saleem v. Keisler Anchor | green | “o matter how narrowly a court defines 'action,' it would require an orwellian twisting of the word to conclude that it means a failure to adjudicate.” | 3 |
| 2 | Liu v. Novak | green | “ction and inaction are distinct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.