2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Murray v. Woodburn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murray v. Woodburn Anchor | green | “mean harassment ... is insufficient to state a constitutional deprivation.” | 3 |
| 2 | Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. Roberson | green | “erbal harassment does not give rise to a constitutional violation enforceable under 1983.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.