2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carmouche v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carmouche v. State Anchor | green | “the tape does not support a conclusion that appellant made these gestures as an indication of consent. indeed, appellant turned around and assumed a position to facilitate the search after he was ordered to do so by one of the officers.” | 3 |
| 2 | David O. Meekins v. State | green | “nor does anyone dispute that the officer's directive to exit arose from what he believed to be appellant's consent to search.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.