2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from A & T CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Sharp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A & T CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Sharp Anchor | green | “we may not consider the requesting party's purpose or use for the information” | 3 |
| 2 | IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. Texas Ind. Acc. Bd. | green | “the act prohibits consideration of the motives of the requesting party in determining whether information must be disclosed” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.