2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. Seligman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. Seligman Anchor | green | “when competitive bidding is used and the procedures followed emasculate the benefits of such bidding, we believe judicial intervention is proper.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hanisco v. Township of Warminster | green | “a deviation from competitive bidding will not be countenanced even where there is no evidence of fraud or favoritism.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.