2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mansour v. King County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mansour v. King County Anchor | green | “lthough we have recognized the emotional importance of pets to their families, legally they remain in many jurisdictions, including washington, property.” | 3 |
| 2 | Mansour v. King County | green | “lthough we have recognized the emotional importance of pets to their families, legally they remain in many jurisdictions, including washington, property.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.