2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alternative Res. v. Ohio Dept., J. and F., Unpublished Decision (12-2-2004).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alternative Res. v. Ohio Dept., J. and F., Unpublished Decision (12-2-2004) Anchor | green | “abuse of discretion' connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court's attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.” | 3 |
| 2 | Blakemore v. Blakemore | green | “abuse of discretion' connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court's attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.