2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marybeth Lauderdale v. Illinois Department of Human S.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marybeth Lauderdale v. Illinois Department of Human S Anchor | green | “basing pay on prior wages could be discriminatory if sex discrimination led to the lower prior wages ... .” | 3 |
| 2 | Dasgupta v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents | green | “n untimely title vii suit cannot be revived by pointing to effects within the limitations period of unlawful acts that occurred earlier.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.