2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Lawrence.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Lawrence Anchor | green | “he relevant inquiry is whether some evidence supports the decision of the board or the governor that the inmate constitutes a current threat to public safety, and not merely some evidence confirms the existence of certain factual findings.” | 3 |
| 2 | In re Shaputis | green | “he proper articulation of the standard of review is whether there exists 'some evidence' that an inmate poses a current threat to public safety, rather than merely some evidence of the existence of a statutory unsuitability factor.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.