2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Bock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Bock Anchor | green | “a defendant may be emotionally disturbed or even psychotic and still be capable of understanding the charges against him and of assisting counsel.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hanscel v. Watters | green | “a defendant may be emotionally disturbed or even psychotic and still be capable of understanding the charges against him and of assisting counsel.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.