2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Com. v. Moroz, R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Com. v. Moroz, R. Anchor | green | “ection 3806(a), which equates prior acceptance of ard to a prior conviction for purposes of imposing a ection 3804 mandatory minimum sentence, passes constitutional muster” | 3 |
| 2 | Com. v. Hind, R. | green | “ll pennsylvania courts, appellate and trial courts alike, are duty bound to apply the law in effect at the time of a decision.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.