5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deborah Baker and Richard Enyeart v. Ibp, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deborah Baker and Richard Enyeart v. Ibp, Inc. Anchor | green | “without a difference between the defendant and the 'enterprise' there can be no violation of rico.” | 16 |
| 2 | Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co. | green | “it is appropriate to accord limited corroborative weight to allegations in another's lawsuit.” | 14 |
| 3 | Empress Casino Joliet Corpora v. Balmoral Racing Club, Incorpor | green | “each use of the wires can be an individual count of wire fraud and an individual rico predicate for the purpose of establishing two predicate acts.” | 11 |
| 4 | Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. Grayheck | green | “where persons associate 'in fact' for criminal purposes . . . each person may be held liable under rico for his, her, or its participation in conducting the affairs of the association in fact through a pattern of racketeering activity.” | 10 |
| 5 | Clarisha Benson v. Fannie May Confections Brands | green | “under illinois law, there is no stand-alone claim for unjust enrichment.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.