2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 54 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Donald A. Henke v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donald A. Henke v. United States Anchor | green | “the fact that acted pro se in the drafting of his complaint may explain its ambiguities, but it does not excuse its failures, if such there be.” | 39 |
| 2 | Minehan v. United States | green | “the fact that acted pro se in the drafting of his complaint may explain its ambiguities, but it does not excuse its failures, if such there be.” | 15 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.