2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of Education Anchor | green | “a nonmoving party's failure to respond to a rule 56.1 statement permits the court to conclude that the facts asserted in the statement are uncontested and admissible.” | 38 |
| 2 | Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc. | green | “the purpose of local rule 56.1 is to streamline the consideration of summary judgment motions by freeing district courts from the need to hunt through voluminous records without guidance from the parties.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.