4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Khalik v. United Air Lines.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khalik v. United Air Lines Anchor | green | “while the 12(b)(6) standard does not require that plaintiff establish a prima facie case in her complaint, the elements of each alleged cause of action help to determine whether plaintiff has set forth a plausible claim.” | 33 |
| 2 | Edwards v. Hiland Roberts Dairy, Co. | green | “we analyze discrimination claims under the nfepa by applying the same analysis for discrimination claims under title vii.” | 8 |
| 3 | Shana Donathan v. Oakley Grain, Inc. | green | “the plaintiff's ultimate burden in a title vii retaliation case is to prove an impermissible retaliatory motive was the 'but-for cause' of the adverse employment action.” | 6 |
| 4 | Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance | green | “he statutory framework of the ada expressly limits discrimination in employment practices to title i of the ada . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.