5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United States Anchor | green | “laintiff must . . . identify a substantive source of law that creates the right to recovery of money damages against the united states.” | 22 |
| 2 | Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor | green | “court may not similarly take a liberal view of jurisdictional requirement and set a different rule for pro se litigants only.” | 8 |
| 3 | Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp) | green | “subject matter jurisdiction is an inquiry that this court must raise sua sponte, even where, as here, neither party has raised this issue.” | 7 |
| 4 | Fremuth v. United States | green | “this court's exercise of jurisdiction is subject, however, to several statutory and jurisprudential prerequisites.” | 5 |
| 5 | Kiselis v. United States | green | “to establish jurisdiction, plaintiff must establish that he filed an administrative refund claim with the irs prior to filing suit in this court.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.