3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boykin v. KeyCorp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boykin v. KeyCorp Anchor | green | “ven after twombly, dismissal of a pro se claim as insufficiently pleaded is appropriate only in the most unsustainable of cases.” | 32 |
| 2 | Espinal v. Goord | green | “a plaintiff can establish a causal connection that suggests retaliation by showing that protected activity was close in time to the adverse action.” | 9 |
| 3 | Boykin v. KeyCorp | green | “ismissal of a pro se claim as insufficiently pleaded is appropriate only in the most unsustainable of cases.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.