Topic: here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #597

5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Blockburger v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Blockburger v. United States Anchor
scotus · 1931
green “here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” 18
2 Blockburger v. United States
scotus · 1931
green “the applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does no…” 12
3 Blockburger v. United States
scotus · 1931
green “he test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.” 8
4 Maryland v. MacOn
scotus · 1985
green “the first amendment imposes special constraints on searches for and seizures of presumptively protected material and requires that the fourth amendment be applied with 'scrupulous exactitude' in such circumstances.” 4
5 Spence v. Washington
scotus · 1974
green “we have no doubt that the state or national governments constitutionally may forbid anyone from mishandling in any manner a flag that is public property.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check