5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Debara DeCamp v. Nancy Berryhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Debara DeCamp v. Nancy Berryhill Anchor | green | “here is no basis to suggest that eliminating jobs with strict production quotas or a fast pace may serve as a proxy for including a moderate limitation on concentration, persistence, and pace.” | 14 |
| 2 | Kip Yurt v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “e have repeatedly rejected the notion that a hypothetical like the one here confining the claimant to simple, routine tasks and limited interactions with others adequately captures temperamental deficiencies and limitations in concentration, persistence, and pace.” | 8 |
| 3 | Melissa Varga v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “true, in some cases, an alj may rely on a doctor's narrative rfc, rather than the checkboxes, where that narrative adequately encapsulates and translates those worksheet observations.” | 8 |
| 4 | James Young v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart | green | “simple, routine" tasks did not adequately account for "impairment in concentration” | 7 |
| 5 | Melissa Varga v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “n alj may rely on a doctor's narrative rfc, rather than the checkboxes, where that narrative adequately encapsulates and translates those worksheet observations.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.