Topic: the statute implies, and has been interpreted to provide, t… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #656

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gravatt v. The City Of New York.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Gravatt v. The City Of New York Anchor
· 2000
green “the statute implies, and has been interpreted to provide, that an employer that is also a vessel owner can be liable to its employees as if it were a third party for negligence in its vessel capacity.” 6
2 Gravatt v. The City Of New York
· 2000
green “we must decide whether s b's conduct renders it liable to gravatt in tort given that it acted in this dual capacity of employer and vessel owner.” 6
3 Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales
ca2 · 2006
green “s a matter of statutory construction, we do not assume congress intended to include pure "surplusage" in its enactments . . . .” 6
4 Hinds County, Miss. v. Wachovia Bank, NA
nysd · 2009
green “a claim of fraudulent concealment must be pled with particularity, in accordance with the heightened pleading standards of fed.r.civ.p. 9(b).” 6
5 Kowalski v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
nywd · 1994
green “the plain reading of 9658 in the context of the mandate which resulted in the sara amendments suggests that the preemption of a state statute of limitations was passed as an additional remedy, not one confined to actual cercla actions.” 6
6 Lauria v. Donahue
nyed · 2006
green “ere allegations in a complaint that a defendant acted in a 'willful', 'deliberate', or 'intentional' manner in causing harm, will not be enough to uphold an intentional tort claim.” 6
7 Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLC
nysd · 2016
green “fraudulent concealment claim is dismissed because the fac fails to allege a strong inference of fraudulent intent as required under rule 9(b) . . . .” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check