8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Panetti v. Quarterman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panetti v. Quarterman Anchor | green | “when a state court's adjudication of a claim is dependent on an antecedent unreasonable application of federal law, the requirement set forth in 2254(d)(1) is satisfied. a federal court must then resolve the claim without the deference aedpa otherwise requires.” | 13 |
| 2 | Snyder v. Louisiana | green | “because we find that the trial court committed clear error in overruling petitioner's batson objection with respect to , we have no need to consider petitioner's claim regarding .” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Renard Maurice Nealy | green | “parties must submit all issues on appeal in their initial briefs.” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Adrian Pielago, Maria Varona | green | “the contemporaneous objection rule fosters finality of judgment and deters 'sandbagging,' saving an issue for appeal in hopes of having another shot at trial if the first one misses.” | 4 |
| 5 | McGahee v. Alabama Department of Corrections | green | “because courts must weigh the defendant's evidence against the prosecutor's articulation of a 'neutral explanation,' courts are directed by batson to consider 'all relevant circumstances' in the third step of the batson analysis.” | 3 |
| 6 | Parker v. Allen | green | “it is not necessary to show that all or even a majority of the prosecutor's strikes were discriminatory; any single strike demonstrated to result from purposeful discrimination is sufficient.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Tate | green | “under the law of this circuit, a defendant forfeits a batson claim if he or she fails to object on this ground in the district court.” | 3 |
| 8 | Ex Parte Bankhead | green | “based on powers, we must now hold that bankhead, a white, has standing under the equal protection clause to challenge the prosecutor's allegedly racially motivated use of peremptory challenges.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.