Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 335 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-Burset Anchor | green | “the relevant inquiry focuses on the reasonableness of the inference of liability that the plaintiff is asking the court to draw from the facts alleged in the complaint.” | 111 |
| 2 | Ruiz Rivera v. PEIZER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC | green | “possess enough heft to show that plaintiff is entitled to relief.” | 92 |
| 3 | Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. | green | “must assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts and give the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences therefrom.” | 55 |
| 4 | Ruiz v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. | green | “must assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts and give plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences therefrom.” | 40 |
| 5 | Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc. | green | “separate factual allegations from conclusory ones and then evaluate whether the factual allegations support a 'reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” | 16 |
| 6 | Frith v. Whole Foods Market, Inc. | green | “if the factual allegations in a complaint, stripped of conclusory legal allegations, raise no 'more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully,' the complaint should be dismissed.” | 12 |
| 7 | National Labor Relations Board v. Solutia, Inc. | green | “step one: isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of-action elements.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.