6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. Anchor | green | “t best, silicone-associated connective tissue disease is an untested hypothesis. at worst, the link has been tested and found to be untenable. therefore, there is no scientific basis for any expert testimony as to its specific presence in plaintiff.” | 12 |
| 2 | Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc. | green | “the case law indicates that the courts are not unfamiliar with the pcr methodology, and in fact some courts have indicated their acceptance of it.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States v. Abel | green | “assessing the probative value of , and weighing any factors counseling against admissibility is a matter first for the district court's sound judgment under rules 401 and 403....” | 7 |
| 4 | Truck Insurance Exchange v. Magnetek, Inc. | green | “the district court noted that 's opinion did not meet the standards of fire investigation himself professed he adhered to.” | 6 |
| 5 | Magdaleno v. Burlington Northern Railroad | green | “in sum, identifies as key authorities in his field.” | 5 |
| 6 | Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc. | green | “the case law indicates that the courts are not unfamiliar with the methodology, and in fact some courts have indicated their acceptance of it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.