2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fridman v. City of New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fridman v. City of New York Anchor | green | “in assessing an application to proceed in forma pauperis, a court may consider the resources that the applicant has or can get from those who ordinarily provide the applicant with the necessities of life, such as from a spouse, parent, adult sibling or other next friend.” | 33 |
| 2 | Advani Enterprises, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds and Syndicate 735 at Lloyds of London | green | “the party seeking to invoke jurisdiction under 28 u.s.c. 1332 bears the burden of demonstrating that the grounds for diversity exist and that diversity is complete.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.