4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nava, Andres Maldonado.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nava, Andres Maldonado Anchor | green | “is a difficult standard to meet and requires a showing that the defendants were deprived of a fair and impartial trial.” | 13 |
| 2 | Cosio v. State | green | “an egregious harm determination must be based on a finding of actual rather than theoretical harm.” | 12 |
| 3 | Marshall v. State | green | “ourts are required to examine the relevant portions of the entire record to determine whether appellant suffered actual harm, as opposed to theoretical harm, as a result of the error.” | 9 |
| 4 | Hughes v. State | green | “although the definitions of 'intentionally' and 'knowingly' indiscriminately set forth the three alternative conduct elements, when those terms are viewed in their factual context, it becomes apparent which conduct element applies to which element of the offense.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.