4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co. Anchor | green | “nce a federal court determines that it is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court is powerless to continue.” | 20 |
| 2 | Cumulus Media, Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc. | green | “preliminary injunctions are, by their nature, products of an expedited process often based upon an underdeveloped and incomplete evidentiary record.” | 8 |
| 3 | Shotz v. Cates | green | “here, the plaintiffs do not allege a real and immediate threat of future discrimination. the complaint contains only past incidents of discrimination. . . . accordingly, the plaintiffs do not have article iii standing .” | 7 |
| 4 | Kawa Orthodontics, LLP v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury | green | “e presume the plaintiff's 'general allegations embrace those specific facts that are necessary to support the claim.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.