Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 558 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bilal v. Driver.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bilal v. Driver Anchor | green | “a claim is frivolous if it is without arguable merit either in law or fact.” | 247 |
| 2 | Mitchell v. Farcass | green | “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” | 218 |
| 3 | Bilal v. Driver | green | “frivolous claims include claims 'describing fantastic or delusional scenarios, claims with which federal district judges are all too familiar.” | 93 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.