4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Banjo v. Ayers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Banjo v. Ayers Anchor | green | “bears the burden of proving that the statute of limitations was tolled.” | 19 |
| 2 | Holland v. Florida | green | “the diligence required for equitable tolling purposes is 'reasonable diligence,' 'maximum feasible diligence” | 9 |
| 3 | Roberts v. Marshall | green | “subsequent state petitions" filed after expiration of the aedpa limitations period do not entitle petitioner "to any additional tolling” | 7 |
| 4 | Porter v. Ollison | green | “the petitioner must show that 'the extraordinary circumstances were the cause of his untimeliness and that the extraordinary circumstances made it impossible to file a petition on time.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.