6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown v. Graham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown v. Graham Anchor | green | “brown's argument that he has a federally-protected liberty interest in the state's compliance with its own prison grievance procedures is meritless.” | 11 |
| 2 | Frohm v. Barnhart | green | “prisoner has no constitutional right to prison grievance procedures.” | 8 |
| 3 | Young v. Gundy | green | “a grievance appeal does not implicate the first amendment right of access to the courts because there is no inherent constitutional right to an effective prison grievance procedure.” | 7 |
| 4 | Hallcy v. Clements | green | “von hallcy cannot state a due process claim based on allegations of an ineffective grievance reporting system.” | 4 |
| 5 | Charriez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | green | “because the prison grievance procedure does not create a protected liberty interest, charriez does not have a federal constitutional right within that administrative-grievance procedure.” | 4 |
| 6 | Young v. Gundy | green | “here is no inherent constitutional right to an effective prison grievance procedure.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.