4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Company Anchor | green | “only those discrimination claims stated in the initial charge, those reasonably related to the original complaint, and those developed by reasonable investigation of the original complaint may be maintained in a subsequent title vii lawsuit.” | 10 |
| 2 | Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Company | green | “the allegations contained in the administrative charge of discrimination generally operate to limit the scope of any subsequent judicial complaint.” | 10 |
| 3 | Mathen Chacko v. Patuxent Institution | green | “this charge frames the scope of future litigation.” | 9 |
| 4 | Puryear v. County Of Roanoke | green | “he aggrieved person may initiate a civil action based on the title vii claims made in her eeoc charge only after receipt of a right-to-sue letter.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.