5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority Anchor | green | “hen a state statute directly regulates or discriminates against interstate commerce... generally str down the statute without further inquiry.” | 7 |
| 2 | General Motors Corp. v. Tracy | green | “any notion of discrimination assumes a comparison of substantially similar entities.” | 7 |
| 3 | Family Winemakers of California v. Jenkins | green | “a state law is discriminatory in effect when, in practice, it affects similarly situated entities in a market by imposing disproportionate burdens on out-of-state interests and conferring advantages upon in-state interests.” | 7 |
| 4 | Pippett v. Waterford Development, LLC | green | “the filing of an amended complaint generally renders a pending motion to dismiss moot.” | 7 |
| 5 | Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers v. Gwadosky | green | “applying these principles, section 10 of l.d.1294 does not discriminate against out-of-state manufacturers, because as a matter of fact, there are no in- state manufacturers to be favored.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.