7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc. Anchor | green | “sometimes the better overall reading of the statute contains some redundancy.” | 9 |
| 2 | McGirt v. Oklahoma | green | “there is no need to consult extratextual sources when the meaning of a statute's terms is clear. nor may extratextual sources overcome those terms.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Alex Guerrero | green | “foster holds that district courts are not required to appoint counsel , but it does not prohibit them from doing so.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Byron Blake | green | “district judges have discretion to recruit and sometimes appoint counsel for prisoners seeking post- judgment benefits.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Fleming | green | “the appointment of cja counsel at this stage rests in the court's sole discretion.” | 4 |
| 6 | CFPB v. Townstone Financial, Inc. | green | “it is the general rule, of course, that a federal ap- pellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon be- low.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.