4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brittain v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brittain v. State Anchor | green | “n appellant must support enumerations of error with argument and citation of authority, and mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by our rules.” | 15 |
| 2 | Tolbert v. Toole | green | “it is 's burden, as the party challenging the ruling below, to affirmatively show error from the record on appeal.” | 9 |
| 3 | Karlsberg v. Hoover | green | “n appellant is required in its initial brief to file an argument which supports any enumerations of error it does not wish to waive.” | 4 |
| 4 | Karlsberg v. Hoover | green | “his court has held that an appellant is required in its initial brief to file an argument which supports any enumerations of error it does not wish to waive.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.