3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sommerfield v. City of Chicago.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sommerfield v. City of Chicago Anchor | green | “summary judgment is not a time to be coy: conclusory statements not grounded in specific facts are not enough” | 20 |
| 2 | Gabrielle M. v. Park Forest-Chicago Heights, Illinois School District 163 | green | “it is well established that in order to withstand summary judgment, the non- movant must allege specific facts creating a genuine issue for trial and may not rely on vague, conclusory allegations” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.