C.F.R. » Title 10 » CHAPTER II—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER A—OIL › PART 205—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS › Subpart F—Interpretation

10 C.F.R. § 205.80

Purpose and scope

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) This subpart establishes the procedures for the filing of a formal request for an interpretation and for the consideration of such request. Responses, which may include verbal or written responses to general inquiries or to other than formal written requests for interpretation filed with the General Counsel or his delegate or a Regional Counsel, are not interpretations and merely provide general information.

(b) A request for interpretation that includes, or could be construed to include an application for an exception or an exemption may be treated solely as a request for interpretation and processed as such.

(Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-159, as amended, Pub. L. 93-511, Pub. L. 94-99, Pub. L. 94-133, Pub. L. 94-163, and Pub. L. 94-385, Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-275, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Pub. L. 94-163, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385; E.O. 11790, 39 FR 23185; Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91; E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267) [39 FR 35489, Oct. 1, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 14437, Apr. 6, 1978]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1976–1998 · leading case: Atl. Richfield Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 429 F. Supp. 1052 (N.D. Cal. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Atl. Richfield Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 429 F. Supp. 1052 (N.D. Cal. 1976). · cites it 2× “See 10 C.F.R. 205.80. An administrative appeal from such an interpretation may be taken by any person aggrieved by that interpretation.”
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 499 F. Supp. 888 (N.D.N.Y. 1980). “With respect to the type of opinion letter relied upon by the defendants herein, 10 C.F.R. §§ 205.80 provides that: Responses, which may include verbal or written responses to general inquiries or to other than formal written requests for interpretations filed with the General…”
Amoco Prod. Co. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 469 F. Supp. 236 (D. Del. 1979). “As a result, on May 18,1978, ARCO requested an interpretation from DOE’s Office of General Counsel, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 205.80 , et seq., which also presented the first sale issue.”
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 653 F.2d 497 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1981). “” 10 C.F.R. § 205.80 . Jones v. Rath Packing Co.”
Pennzoil Co. v. Dep't of Energy, 466 F. Supp. 238 (D. Del. 1979). “10 C.F.R. § 205.80 , et seq. Section 205.”
Stand. Oil Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 453 F. Supp. 203 (N.D. Ohio 1978). “On April 29, 1975, Mobil Oil Corporation submitted a formal request for an interpretation to the FEA under the procedures articulated in 10 C.F.R. §§ 205.80 et seq. 67 In that request Mobil suggested the same regulatory interpretation that was ulti *216 mately adopted in the…”
Diversified Chemicals & Propellants Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 432 F. Supp. 859 (N.D. Ill. 1977). “To begin with, interpretations are discussed in, and governed by 10 C.F.R. § 205.80 et seq. Section 205.86 deals with appeal from an interpretation.”
The Crude Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n & Dep't of Energy & the United States, 135 F.3d 1445 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “TCC could have obtained an official interpretation of the regulations by filing a formal request under 10 C.F.R. § 205.80 (1977), see 39 Fed.Reg.”
Valero Energy Corp. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 509 F. Supp. 644 (W.D. Tex. 1980). · cites it 3× “” 10 C.F.R. § 205.80 (a). A request for interpretation must be filed with the Office of General Counsel or the appropriate regional counsel.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.