12 C.F.R. § 1015.1
Scope of regulations in this part
This part, known as Regulation O, is issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to implement the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act, Public Law 111-8, section 626, 123 Stat. 524 (Mar. 11, 2009), as clarified by the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, Public Law 111-24, section 511, 123 Stat. 1734 (May 22, 2009), and as amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, Public Law 111-203, section 1097, 124 Stat. 1376 (July 21, 2010). This part applies to persons over which the Federal Trade Commission has jurisdiction under the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2016–2019 · leading case: Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, 194 F. Supp. 3d 1238 (M.D. Fla. 2016).
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Lanier Law, LLC, 194 F. Supp. 3d 1238 (M.D. Fla. 2016). “See 12 C.F.R. § 1015.1 ; Rescission of Rules, 77 FR 22200 -01, 2012 WL 1228063 (Apr.”
People ex rel. Madigan v. Wildermuth, 2016 IL App (1st) 143592 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “(West 2010)) or the federal Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule ( 12 C.F.R. § 1015.1 et seq. (2012)) and charged consumers nonrefundable fees that ranged from $3,000 to $5,000, which often exceeded the consumers’ monthly mortgage payments.”
People ex rel. Madigan v. Wildermuth, 2016 IL App (1st) 143592 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “(West 2010)) or the federal Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule ( 12 C.F.R. § 1015.1 et seq. (2012)) and charged consumers nonrefundable fees that ranged from $3,000 to $5,000, which often exceeded the consumers’ monthly mortgage payments.”
Balderas v. Real Est. Law Ctr., PC (D.N.M. 2019). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND New Mexico alleges that: (i) Real Estate Law violated the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule, 12 C.F.R. 1015.1, “Regulation O,” by soliciting and accepting advance fees from New Mexico residents before “a mortgage modification agreement [was]…”
Balderas v. Real Est. Law Ctr., PC (D.N.M. 2019). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND New Mexico contends that: (i) the Defendants violated the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (“MARS”) Rule, 12 C.F.R. 1015.1 “Regulation O,” by accepting advance payment for mortgage relief services, and/or Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.