C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER G—AIR CARRIERS AND OPERATORS FOR COMPENSATION OR HIRE: CERTIFICATION AND OPERATIONS › PART 121—OPERATING REQUIREMENTS: DOMESTIC, FLAG, AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATIONS › Subpart S—Flight Time Limitations: Supplemental Operations

14 C.F.R. § 121.521

Flight time limitations: Crew of two pilots and one additional airman as required

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) No certificate holder conducting supplemental operations may schedule an airman to be aloft as a member of the flight crew in an airplane that has a crew of two pilots and at least one additional flight crewmember for more than 12 hours during any 24 consecutive hours.

(b) If an airman has been aloft as a member of a flight crew for 20 or more hours during any 48 consecutive hours or 24 or more hours during any 72 consecutive hours, he must be given at least 18 hours of rest before being assigned to any duty with the certificate holder. In any case, he must be relieved of all duty for at least 24 consecutive hours during any seven consecutive days.

(c) No airman may be aloft as a flight crewmember more than—

(1) 120 hours during any 30 consecutive days; or

(2) 300 hours during any 90 consecutive days.

[Docket 6258, 29 FR 19218, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended by Amdt. 121-17, 31 FR 1147, Jan. 28, 1966; Amdt. 121-253, 61 FR 2613, Jan. 26, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: McDonnell v. Guilford Cnty. Tradewind Airlines, Inc., 670 S.E.2d 302 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McDonnell v. Guilford Cnty. Tradewind Airlines, Inc., 670 S.E.2d 302 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 7× “§ 63-13 are too vague and ambiguous to constitute a public policy exception to North Carolina’s at-will employment doctrine; (II) granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and concluding, as a matter of fact, that no reasonable jury could conclude that defendant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.