14 C.F.R. § 21.41
Type certificate
Each type certificate is considered to include the type design, the operating limitations, the certificate data sheet, the applicable regulations of this subchapter with which the FAA records compliance, and any other conditions or limitations prescribed for the product in this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1976–2017 · leading case: GoJet Airlines, LLC v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 743 F.3d 1168 (8th Cir. 2014).
GoJet Airlines, LLC v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 743 F.3d 1168 (8th Cir. 2014). “If a CRJ-700’s landing gear is inoperable, the airplane may not take off unless the FAA has issued the carrier an approved special operating protocol known as the Minimum Equipment List (“MEL”), which “constitutes an approved change to the type design.”
Ranger Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 544 P.2d 250 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976). “The type certificate is considered to include the operating limitations for that aircraft ( 14 C.F.R. § 21.41 ). Under 14 C.F.R. § 23.”
Crane Helicopter Servs., Inc. v. United States, 45 Fed. Cl. 410 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “The importance of the type certificate, in turn, is demonstrated through its definition in 14 C.F.R. § 21.41 (1992): Each type certificate is considered to include the type design, the operating limitations, the certificate data sheet, the applicable regulations of this…”
Frosty v. Textron, Inc., 891 F. Supp. 551 (D. Or. 1995). “§ 1423 (a)(2); 14 CFR §§ 21.41 , 21.50. Although they have, defendants are not required to submit expert testimony on the issue of useful safe life; they need only establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.”
Crane Helicopter Servs., Inc. v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “The importance of the type certificate, in turn, is demonstrated through its definition in 14 C.F.R. § 21.41 (2001): Each type certificate is considered to include the type design, the operating limitations, the certificate data sheet, the applicable regulations of this…”
Sikkelee v. AVCO Corp., 268 F. Supp. 3d 660 (M.D. Penn. 2017). “6 Although 14 C.F.R. § 21.41 does not separate the type certificate data sheet into a main section and a notes section, the FAA has elected to do so for clarification and standardization purposes.”
Frosty v. Textron, Inc., 891 F. Supp. 550 (D. Or. 1995). “§ 1428 (a)(2); 14 CFR §§ 21.41 , 21.50. Although they have, defendants are not required to submit expert testimony on the issue of useful safe life; they need only establish the absence of a genuine issue of material fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.