C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) › SUBCHAPTER B—PROCEDURAL REGULATIONS › PART 302—RULES OF PRACTICE IN PROCEEDINGS › Subpart A—Rules of General Applicability

14 C.F.R. § 302.15

Non-hearing procedures

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In cases where oral evidentiary hearing procedures will not be used, § 302.17 through § 302.37, relating to hearing procedures, shall not be applicable except to the extent that the DOT decisionmaker shall determine that the application of some or all of such rules in the particular case will be conducive to the proper dispatch of its business and to the public interest. References in these and other sections of this part to powers or actions by administrative law judges shall not apply.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1980 · leading case: The Palisades Citizens Ass'n, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., Washington Airways, Inc., Intervenor, 420 F.2d 188 (D.C. Cir. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The Palisades Citizens Ass'n, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., Washington Airways, Inc., Intervenor, 420 F.2d 188 (D.C. Cir. 1969). · cites it 3× “They requested permission to intervene formally in the determination pending before the Board either as formal parties pursuant to Rule 15 of the Board’s Rules of Practice, 14 C.F.R. § 302.15 (1968) 2 or as interested persons under Rule 14 of the Rules, 14 C.”
Am. Trucking Ass'n v. United States, 627 F.2d 1313 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “15 (b) (1979) provides: In passing upon a petition to intervene, the following factors, among other things, will be considered: (1) The nature of the petitioner’s right under the statute to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the property, financial…”
City of San Antonio v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 374 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “In passing upon a petition to intervene, the following factors, among other things, will be considered: (1) The nature of the petitioner’s right under the statute to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the property, financial or other interest of the…”
The City of San Antonio & the San Antonio Chamber of Com. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., the Greater Tampa Chamber of Com., the City of Tampa, & the Cnty. of Hillsborough, Florida v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., State of Wisconsin v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 374 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “10 Rule 15(b), 14 C.F.R. 302.15(b), reads: "(b) Considerations relevant to determination of petition to intervene.”
— 14 C.F.R. § 302.15(b) — 2 cases
City of San Antonio v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 374 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “In passing upon a petition to intervene, the following factors, among other things, will be considered: (1) The nature of the petitioner’s right under the statute to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of the property, financial or other interest of the…”
The City of San Antonio & the San Antonio Chamber of Com. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., the Greater Tampa Chamber of Com., the City of Tampa, & the Cnty. of Hillsborough, Florida v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., State of Wisconsin v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 374 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1967). “10 Rule 15(b), 14 C.F.R. 302.15(b), reads: "(b) Considerations relevant to determination of petition to intervene.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.