C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) › SUBCHAPTER D—SPECIAL REGULATIONS › PART 380—PUBLIC CHARTERS › Subpart B—Conditions and Limitations

14 C.F.R. § 380.12

Cancellation by charter operator and notice to participants

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The charter operator may not cancel a charter for any reason (including insufficient participation), except for circumstances that make it physically impossible to perform the charter trip, less than 10 days before the scheduled date of departure of the outbound trip.

(b) If the charter operator cancels 10 or more days before the scheduled date of departure, the operator must so notify each participant in writing within 7 days after the cancellation but in any event not less than 10 days before the scheduled departure date of the outbound trip. If a charter is canceled less than 10 days before scheduled departure (i.e., for circumstances that make it physically impossible to perform the charter trip), the operator must get the message to each participant as soon as possible.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–2004 · leading case: Bonano v. East Caribbean Airline Corp., 365 F.3d 81 (1st Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bonano v. East Caribbean Airline Corp., 365 F.3d 81 (1st Cir. 2004). “See 14 C.F.R. §§ 380.12 , 380.32(f) & (k), 380.”
I.L.T.A., Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 739 F.2d 82 (2d Cir. 1984). “Otherwise, under CAB regulation 14 C.F.R. § 380.12 , United might be required to operate charter flights for which it had not been paid.”
Bonano v. East Caribbean Airline Corp., 253 F. Supp. 2d 166 (D.P.R. 2003). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff claims that Co-Defendant East Caribbean violated 14 C.F.R. § 380.12 because it did not notify Plaintiff in writing within seven days after the cancellation.”
Arrow Air, Inc. v. Dole, 784 F.2d 1118 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “11 , restrictions on cancellation, 14 C.F.R. § 380.12 , and security (surety bonds and escrows), 14 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.