14 C.F.R. § 43.12
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1992–2019 · leading case: Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246 (1994).
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246 (1994). “See Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding and Alteration, 14 CFR §43.12 (1992). On February 2, 1987, respondent was hired by petitioner Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.”
Robert Edward Olsen v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 14 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 1994). “12(a), 14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (a), we deny the petition and affirm.”
Willett v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 851 N.E.2d 626 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “…records are punishable by suspension or revocation of the perpetrator’s airman, mechanic, or repairman certificate. 14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (2005).”
Norris v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 842 P.2d 634 (Haw. 1992). “See Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration, 14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (1992). On July 15, 1987, 3 Norris was conducting a routine preflight inspection on one of HAL’s DC-9 aircraft when he noticed that one of the main landing gear tires was worn.”
Thunderbird Propellers, Inc. v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 191 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 1999). “Count III states that Thunderbird intentionally falsified maintenance records in violation of 14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (a). Section 43.12(a) provides in relevant part: No person may make or cause to be made: (1) Any fraudulent or intentionally false entry in any record or report that…”
Matt Lawson v. Michael Huerta, 692 F. App'x 790 (6th Cir. 2017). “14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (a). Intentional falsification is a “knowing misrepresentation of a material fact.”
Robert S. Borregard v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd. Fed. Aviation Admin., 46 F.3d 944 (9th Cir. 1995). “GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Robert Borregard appeals an NTSB decision affirming an FAA Emergency Order revoking his aircraft mechanic certificate and inspection authority on the charge that Bor-regard altered an aircraft’s maintenance logs for a fraudulent purpose in violation of 14…”
Jason D Giordano v. Williams Int'l Co LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “3(d) (2012) and 14 CFR 43.12 (1982) but he refused and was fired.”
Patrick Theo Freiwald v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 686 F. App'x 719 (11th Cir. 2017). “In revoking Freiwald’s mechanic’s certifícate and inspection authorization, the ALJ found that Freiwald violated 14 C.F.R. §§ 43.12 (a)(1), 43.13(a) & (b), and 43.”
Robbins v. Blakey, 60 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2003). “I Robbins argues that the NTSB erred by affirming the ALJ’s decision to take notice of Federal Aviation Regulations which establish that Robbins’s admittedly fraudulent entry in an aircraft maintenance log was in a report that was “required to be made” in violation of 14 C.F.R.…”
Hollingsworth v. Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 17 F. App'x 729 (9th Cir. 2001). “With respect to the 14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (a) violation, Petitioners argue the Administrator failed to carry her burden of proving Hollingsworth knowingly falsified N1590R’s maintenance log.”
Diaz v. Dep't of Transp., 65 F. App'x 594 (9th Cir. 2003). “14 C.F.R. § 43.12 (a)(1). (b). Although the regulations provide that either sanction may be appropriate, because the FAA’s publicly available enforcement sanction guidelines state that the appropriate sanction for falsification of records or reports is revocation, the NTSB was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.