17 C.F.R. § 13.2

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1984 · leading case: Jordon v. New York Mercantile Exch., 571 F. Supp. 1530 (S.D.N.Y. 1983).
Jordon v. New York Mercantile Exch., 571 F. Supp. 1530 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). “2, 17 C.F.R. § 13.2 , provides that any person may petition the agency to exercise its power to amend a futures contract; and the legislative history of § 5a(10) of the CEA, 7 U.”
Sam Wong & Son, Inc. v. New York Mercantile Exch., 735 F.2d 653 (2d Cir. 1984). “2, 17 C.F.R. § 13.2 , at 176, provides that “[a]ny person may file a petition with [the CFTC] for the issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule of general application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.