17 C.F.R. § 201.1001

Adjustment of civil monetary penalties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) For violations from December 10, 1996, through November 2, 2015: As required by the Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, the Commission has adjusted the maximum amounts of all civil monetary penalties it administers under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for inflation in the releases and prior regulations listed in the footnotes to Table I. The penalty amounts provided in Table I apply to violations of these statutes that occurred from December 10, 1996, through November 2, 2015, with each column listing the penalty amounts for violations that occurred in a particular time frame. To determine the penalty amounts for violations that occurred prior to December 10, 1996, please refer to the applicable statutory text. To determine penalty amounts for violations after November 2, 2015, please refer to paragraph (b) of this section.

(b) For violations after November 2, 2015: The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), requires that civil monetary penalties be adjusted on an annual basis for inflation. Pursuant to this requirement, the maximum amounts of all civil monetary penalties under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will be adjusted annually for inflation. Notice of these adjusted penalty amounts will be published by the Commission in the Federal Register on or before January 15 of each calendar year and will be available, along with the Commission's prior inflation adjustments, on the Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov/enforce/civil-penalties-inflation-adjustments.htm. The adjusted penalty amounts will apply to all penalties imposed after the effective date of the adjustment (for the first day the adjustment is effective, the prior year's penalty amounts shall apply), for violations that occurred after November 2, 2015. The adjusted penalty amount each year will be the larger of:

(1) The maximum penalty amount for the previous calendar year; or

(2) An amount adjusted for inflation, calculated by multiplying the maximum penalty amount for the previous calendar year by the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the month of October preceding the current calendar year exceeds the CPI-U for the month of October of the calendar year two years prior to the current calendar year, adding that amount to the amount for the previous calendar year, and rounding the total to the nearest dollar.

Table I to 201.1001—Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustments for Violations From December 10, 1996, Through November 2, 2015

U.S. Code citationCivil monetary penalty
description
Date of violation and corresponding penalty
Dec. 10, 1996-
Feb. 2, 2001 i
Feb. 3, 2001-
Feb. 14, 2005 ii
Feb. 15, 2005-
Mar. 3, 2009 iii
Mar. 4, 2009-
Mar. 5, 2013 iv
Mar. 6, 2013-
Nov. 2, 2015 v
15 U.S.C. 77h-1(g) (Securities Act Sec. 8A(g))For natural person
For any other person
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
vi $7,500
vi 75,000
$7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraudN/AN/AN/Avi 75,00080,000
For any other person/fraudN/AN/AN/Avi 375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to selfN/AN/AN/Avi 150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to selfN/AN/AN/Avi 725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 77t(d) (Securities Act Sec. 20(d))For natural person
For any other person
$5,500
55,000
$6,500
60,000
$6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3) (Exchange Act Sec. 21(d)(3))For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 78u-1(a)(3) (Exchange Act Sec. 21A(a)(3))Insider Trading—controlling person1,100,0001,200,0001,275,0001,425,0001,525,000
15 U.S.C. 78u-2 (Exchange Act Sec. 21B)For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 78ff(b) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(b))Exchange Act/failure to file information documents, reports110110110110210
15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(1)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(1)(B))Foreign Corrupt Practices—any issuer11,00011,00011,00016,00016,000
15 U.S.C. 78ff(c)(2)(B) (Exchange Act Sec. 32(c)(2)(B))Foreign Corrupt Practices—any agent or stockholder acting on behalf of issuer11,00011,00011,00016,00016,000
15 U.S.C. 80a-9(d) (Investment Company Act Sec. 9(d))For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 80a-41(e) (Investment Company Act Sec. 42(e))For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 80b-3(i) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 203(i))For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gains to self110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others or gain to self550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 80b-9(e) (Investment Advisers Act Sec. 209(e))For natural person
For any other person
5,500
55,000
6,500
60,000
6,500
65,000
7,500
75,000
7,500
80,000
For natural person/fraud55,00060,00065,00075,00080,000
For any other person/fraud275,000300,000325,000375,000400,000
For natural person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others110,000120,000130,000150,000160,000
For any other person/fraud/substantial losses or risk of losses to others550,000600,000650,000725,000775,000
15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(i) (Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(i))For natural person
For any other person
N/A
N/A
vii 100,000
vii 2,000,000
110,000
2,100,000
120,000
2,375,000
130,000
2,525,000
15 U.S.C. 7215(c)(4)(D)(ii) (Sarbanes-Oxley Act Sec. 105(c)(4)(D)(ii))For natural person
For any other person
N/A
N/A
vii 750,000
vii 15,000,000
800,000
15,825,000
900,000
17,800,000
950,000
18,925,000
i Release Nos. 33-7361, 34-37912, IA-1596, IC-22310, dated November 1, 1996 (effective December 9, 1996), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1001 and Table I to Subpart E of Part 201.
ii Release Nos. 33-7946, 34-43897, IA-1921, IC-24846, dated January 31, 2001 (effective February 2, 2001), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1002 and Table II to Subpart E of Part 201.
iii Release Nos. 33-8530, 34-51136, IA-2348, IC-26748, dated February 9, 2005 (effective February 14, 2005), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1003 and Table III to Subpart E of Part 201.
iv Release Nos. 33-9009, 34-59449, IA-2845, IC-28635, dated February 25, 2009 (effective March 3, 2009), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1004 and Table IV to Subpart E of Part 201.
v Release Nos. 33-9387, 34-68994, IA-3557, IC-30408, dated February 27, 2013 (effective March 5, 2013), previously found at 17 CFR 201.1005 and Table V to Subpart E of Part 201.
vi Effective from July 21, 2010 (enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203), through March 5, 2013.
vii Effective from July 30, 2002 (enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107-204), through February 14, 2005.
[82 FR 5371, Jan. 18, 2017]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Ussec v. Imran Husain, 70 F.4th 1173 (9th Cir. 2023).
Ussec v. Imran Husain, 70 F.4th 1173 (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 3× “§§ 77t(d)(2)(B), 78u(d)(3)(B)(ii); 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 (a) & Table I. 8 Husain and Jaclin sold five shell companies within the statute of limitations period for total proceeds of $1,787,000.”
SEC v. Fowler, 6 F.4th 255 (2d Cir. 2021). “See 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 . 16 In Fowler’s case, the penalty was adjusted to $150,000.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Esposito, 260 F. Supp. 3d 79 (D. Mass. 2017). “See 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 and Table I. C. Permanent Injunction The SEC has also requested that the Court enter a permanent injunction enjoining Lionshare from committing further violations of the federal securities laws.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. COLONIAL Inv. Mgmt. LLC, 659 F. Supp. 2d 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 78u(d)(3); see also 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 . In the first tier, for non-scienter violations, the penalty cannot exceed (a) the greater of $6,500, or (b) the gross amount of pecuniary gain to the defendant as a result of the violation.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Weed, 315 F. Supp. 3d 667 (D.D.C. 2018). “17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 & Tbl. I (increasing the maximum Tier-III penalty from the statutory limit of $100,000 to account for inflation adjustments).”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Chapman, 826 F. Supp. 2d 847 (D. Maryland 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 78u(d)(3), as amended by 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 ; 3. Default judgment BE, and HEREBY IS, ENTERED against CCM as follows: a.”
United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Lyttle, 538 F.3d 601 (7th Cir. 2008). “) The district judge granted summary judgment for the SEC on a variety of counts, awarded injunctive relief, and assessed monetary penalties.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Levine, 517 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.D.C. 2007). “See 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 . 7 . According to the filing: Gerald H.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Tecumseh Holdings Corp., 765 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.1001 , 201.1002, 110 . 15 U.”
U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Johnston, 368 F. Supp. 3d 247 (D.D.C. 2019). “17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 & Tbl. I (increasing the maximum Tier III penalty from the statutory limit of $ 100,000 to $ 150,000 to account for inflation).”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Johnson, 174 F. App'x 111 (3rd Cir. 2006). “…violations occurred before February 2, 2001, the applicable inflation-adjusted penalty should be $110,000. See 17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 & tbl. I.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Miller, 744 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (N.D. Ga. 2010). “17 C.F.R. § 201.1001 . 19 . Defendant cites other cases from district courts around the country in which defendants were not assessed civil penalties because they were impecunious or because they did not gain a large personal benefit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.