C.F.R. » Title 17 » CHAPTER II—SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION › PART 240—GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 › Subpart A—Rules and Regulations Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-13

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–1993 · leading case: In Re Sea-Land Corp. Shareholders Litig., 642 A.2d 792 (Del. Ch. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Sea-Land Corp. Shareholders Litig., 642 A.2d 792 (Del. Ch. 1993). “" 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13(a). It is important to note that the plaintiffs never brought any action asserting claims based on these or other federal securities law provisions in connection with this transaction.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Roussel, 485 F. Supp. 295 (D. Kan. 1980). “It is likewise clear that these defendants did violate Rule 10b-13, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13 which prohibits a person who is making a tender offer from purchasing stock in the open market outside the tender offer.”
Koppers Co., Inc. v. Am. Exp. Co., 689 F. Supp. 1413 (W.D. Pa. 1988). “10b-6 (relating to trading by persons interested in a distribution); Rule 10b-13, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13 (relating to purchases during a tender offer or exchange offer).”
Grover v. Simmons, 642 A.2d 792 (Del. Ch. 1993). “until the expiration of the [tender offer] period_” 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13(a). It is important to note that the plaintiffs never brought any action asserting claims based on these or other federal securities law provisions in connection with this transaction.”
Johnston v. Wilbourn, 682 F. Supp. 879 (S.D. Miss. 1988). “§ 78j(b), and (2) Rule 10b-13 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13; (3) Section 14(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.”
— 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-13(a) — 2 cases
In Re Sea-Land Corp. Shareholders Litig., 642 A.2d 792 (Del. Ch. 1993). “" 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13(a). It is important to note that the plaintiffs never brought any action asserting claims based on these or other federal securities law provisions in connection with this transaction.”
Grover v. Simmons, 642 A.2d 792 (Del. Ch. 1993). “until the expiration of the [tender offer] period_” 17 C.F.R. 240.10b-13(a). It is important to note that the plaintiffs never brought any action asserting claims based on these or other federal securities law provisions in connection with this transaction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.