18 C.F.R. § 1318.400
Purpose and scope
(a) TVA will prepare an EIS for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The EIS will address each of the elements identified in section 102(2)(C) of NEPA.
(b) TVA will focus its analysis on whether the environmental effects of the proposed action are significant.
(c) Similarly, TVA will document in the EIS where and how it drew a reasonable and manageable line relating to its consideration of any environmental effects from the action or project at hand that extend outside the geographical territory of the project or might materialize later in time.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Tennessee Valley Auth. (M.D. Tenn. 2024).
Sierra Club v. Tennessee Valley Auth. (M.D. Tenn. 2024). “” 18 C.F.R. § 1318.400 (e). The consideration of a “no action alternative” is intended to “compare the potential impacts of the proposed major federal action to the known impacts of maintaining the status quo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.